Even though the scientific method can be (and has been) used to prove or disprove this “historical fact,” here’s an example of how easy just a little skeptical inquiry and honest historiography can be used to expose the Treblinka holohoax for the fraud that it is; Holocaust “expert” Yitzak Arad: “All we do have is survivors’ evidence and testimony… this is the main source for our information about the camp… No trace of the extermination operation remain.” (Arad’s “expert testimony” at the trial of John Demjanjuk.) Yet Treblinka “survivor / eyewitness” Szyja Warszawski claims: “The ashes that remained after the burning were thrown back into the pits where the bodies had been dug out earlier… For some pits only the top layer of bodies was dug out. The rest of the bodies were covered over with soil…” (Warszawski’s “eyewitness testimony” to the Main Commission for the Investigation of the Hitlerite Crimes in Poland.) So who do you believe – the so-called “experts” or the alleged “eyewitnesses?” These contradictory claims can’t both be true. (But they can both be false!) The official Treblinka story is based entirely on fraudulent “eyewitness accounts,” yet numerous “eyewitness accounts” totally contradict the official story. Yet it is literally a thought crime in 15 countries of the world for not simultaneously believing both of these contradictory claims! But it gets worse. There are many more new lies being told to cover up the old. The holocaust industry’s asinine response to Krege’s scientific / forensic debunking of the alleged Treblinka holocaust is to claim that the reason he found no evidence of the alleged huge mass graves was because the Germans “obliterated” all evidence of their crime. Yet at the same time, MICHAEL SHERMER claims that he’s used the methods of science to prove the orthodox version of the alleged Treblinka holocaust! What’s wrong with this picture? (Other than the fact that he refuses to publish his results.) To illustrate the sophistic machinations that the holocaust industry (which of course includes Shermer and his “Skeptics” Society) has gone through to make this fraudulent claim, look at this montage of quotes from Shermer’s spurious novel-as-true-history – Denying History: “The purpose of this book is to… show precisely, with solid evidence, how we know the Holocaust happened… we must obey the rules of reason and apply the tools of science… Historians both discover and describe the past, just as natural scientists… we can use the methods of science to… marshal the evidence and apply tight logic… This process is practiced by all scientists… historical scientists, geologists, paleontologists and archaeologists, to prove that anything in the past happened… We must review the physical evidence in conjunction with written documents and eyewitness testimonies… As historical scientists, however, we realize that… when the participating scholars play by the rules of science, logic, and reason… hypotheses can be weighed against the evidence… We know that the Holocaust happened through the tried and true method employed by all historical scientists… our book clearly presented the convergence of evidence for how we know the Holocaust happened.” Well now, that changes everything doesn’t it? If Shermer, who insists that he must see compelling evidence before he believes anything, has proven the holocaust via the scientific method, then there must be tons of tangible physical evidence that proves the alleged Treblinka holocaust, right? But why then didn’t any of this “physical evidence” show up on Krege’s GPR scan? And if the Jews dispute Krege’s results, then why haven’t they conducted their own forensic / GPR examination of Treblinka? They could easily and conclusively prove the alleged Treblinka holocaust in a heartbeat by using real science and modern technology. (IF the story is true.) Why do you think they had to resort to the false “science of history” to counter the real sciences of forensic criminology.